Free Web space and hosting from freewebspace.com
Search the Web

 

 


HOME

Read/Sign
GUESTBOOK


WHAT'S NEW  & UPDATES

We get EMAILS...

We get AWARDS

Webmaster's Tales

Jan's Tales

It Came Out of The Sky

Reader's
Tales

Untitled
Tales

Featured
Tales

Special Mention Tales

Hard to Explain Tales

FAMOUS CASES

Tell Me a Story.. (Submit YOUR Tale)

SUBMISSION RULES (Read BEFORE Submitting!)

Why I Made This Site

Links Pages

Webrings

DISCLAIMER

Contact The WebMaster

FAMOUS CASES

The Exorcist

(NOTE: For more information on the case that led to the books and movies, I recommend you read "Possessed - The True Story of an Exorcism" by Thomas B. Allen.  The author was able to obtain a copy of the infamous 'dairy' written by Father Bishop during 'Rob Doe's' exorcism.  I do NOT recommend you read this book at night... I tried, and found there weren't enough lights in the house to keep me comfortable...)

Few would argue with the statement that the film "The Exorcist" stands as one of the most frightening ever made.  Who doesn't remember the first time they saw it?  The images of this film haunted me for months afterwards... but it was my curiosity about the story behind the film that taunted me long after the mental images faded... It's common knowledge now that the film was based on an actual case, but until recently, it has been extremely difficult to find any details about the original case.  Until now...

On August 20, 1949, the Washington Post ran a story titled, "Priest Frees Mt. Rainier Boy Reported Held in Devil's Grip," written by Bill Brinkley.  According to the article, the rite of exorcism was performed on a 14 year old boy by a Catholic priest, supposedly to free him from demonic possession.  It is this story that served as the basis for the novel, "The Exorcist" written by William Peter Blatty in 1969-71.  Blatty claims that he had written a letter to the priest who performed the actual exorcism, and prints a censored version of the priest's response in the 1974 printing of the novel. 

The priest claimed that a diary existed, consisting of a daily record of the exorcism as it was performed, which was written by another priest, Father Bishop, who attended it.  Blatty managed to eventually read a copy of this diary, but he does not reveal how he came upon it.   It is this diary that the now infamous novel and movie are based upon.

But, who was the boy, where did he live, and where did the exorcism take place?  Who performed the exorcism?   What do the witnesses claim happened during the exorcism?  What does the boy himself say about these events?  Read on...

In the "true" story, the victim of possession was a 13 year-old boy.  the only reference I could find about the boys' name was the alias, "Rob Doe."  However, in one instance, he was referred to as "Roland."   

The general information claims the boy lived in Mt. Rainier, Washington D.C., at 3210 Bunker Hill Road.  However, a search of the records of ownership for that property clearly prove that in 1949, the only occupants of the house were Joseph Haas, and his sister-in-law, Grace Miller.  Mr. Haas was a widower at the time of the exorcism, and he died in 1951 of heart problems, after a lengthy hospital stay.  Ms. Miller gave piano lessons in the house.  Neither occupant had ever had children, nor had there
ever been any children known to live in the house, until the late 1950s.  Why the rumour about the exorcism being performed there, and that the victim lived there at the time is so persistent is unusual, considering that it can be proved that the rumour is untrue.  It may have been a cover-up to protect the family from the press, and other unwanted attention.

The Bunker Hill Road house was burned down in March, 1962, as part of a firefighter's training exercise in an Advanced Training Course in Firemanship, with the Mount Rainier Fire Department.  If this house was the site of an actual exorcism as claimed, none of the local people, neighbors, fire department, paper deliverers, or piano lesson students are aware of it...

The actual address where the boy lived was at 3807 40th Avenue, in Cottage City, Maryland.  A friend from childhood describes Rob Doe as being somewhat quiet and sedentary as a child, not interested in sports.  Another childhood friend gives a more negative description of Doe.  Apparently, he had a dysfunctional childhood, dominated by his religiously obsessive mother and grandmother, who also had a strong interest in spiritualism and Ouija Boards.  Doe suffered from tantrums that would explode into violent outbursts against his family and friends.  He was also, at times cruel and even sadistic towards animals and other children.  Doe was temporarily taken out of school when he was in the 8th grade, after an incident in class where the desk he was sitting in began to shake violently.  When told to stop, he claimed, "I'm not doing it."  He returned to school later that same year.  The time he was absent from school was when the exorcism was performed.

There were actually two exorcism attempts.  The first, was held at Georgetown University Hospital, and a Father Edward Hughes performed it.  Hughes served as assistant pastor of St. James from June 16, 1948, to June 18, 1960.  Doe was admitted to Georgetown Hospital on February 28, 1949, and released on March 3, 1949.  It was then the exorcism attempt was made.  Apparently it was unsuccessful.  This was the first exorcism Father Hughes had performed.

The second exorcism was performed by Father Bowdern and others.  One of the assistants was Father Walter Halloran, who was 26 at the time of the exorcism.  What happened during the exorcism?  Here is a summary of what Father Halloran claimed in a telephone interview  with Mark Opsasnick for Strange Magazine:

Rob Doe spoke only English and some Latin - Halloran believed he was mimicking the priests.  Doe's voice didn't change, he didn't exhibit extraordinary strength.  Halloran didn't see the boy urinate, defecate, or vomit.  Doe did spit frequently, but not significantly.  Markings did appear on the boy's skin, looking as though they had been applied with lipstick.  Halloran never saw Doe mark his skin--the boy's hands were never near the markings.  The markings were not seen by Halloran to form words, letters, or numbers, just clear lines.  No blood was seen dripping from the marks.

The only things witnessed by Father Halloran during the exorcism that could be described as at all "paranormal" was a bottle slid from a dresser and across the room, with no one near it.  The bed moved, but it was on rollers "like any bed", although once it moved when Halloran was leaning on it.  Halloran was one of the few people in possession of a copy of the infamous exorcism diary.  He burned it.

The contents of the diary may never be published, never read by the general public.  Apparently, only a few copies exist, and there is some doubt as to whether they contain accurate information, or whether the events were embellished for dramatic effect.  We may never really know just what happened to Rob Doe in the months from February, 1949, to April of that same year. 

Today, Rob Doe does not discuss his experiences in the spring of 1949.  He had a difficult childhood, apparently suffered some behavioral problems because of it, and found himself the victim of supposed demonic possession, and subjected to exorcism rituals.  I don't think I would want to talk about it either. 

-Webmaster.


View the GUESTBOOK  |  This site designed by © San Perry  |  Contact the Webmaster  |  DISCLAIMER  |
Story Submissions: guardiantales@hotmail.com  |  SUBMISSION RULES: guardiantales@getresponse.com